How to see "War" - Wirelesswire News

It goes without saying that war is not good, but we may be too aware of what kind of mechanics the war is moving.The war is constantly occurring, rather than the war begins when a military collision occurs.It is not happening in the battlefield, it is happening on this screen, and it is partially involved in the war each time we share some information and decide on some conclusions.It will be.

Regardless of the mass media or SNS, the right and wrong are easily discussed, but what do you know?It is easy to forgot that we are discussing what we are talking about is based on some "information".The information is "information" by someone, and there is always a position, interpretation, and claim on the back.In addition, our awareness has many pitfalls.

The war has already entered with such a recognition hole, but isn't it too vulnerable to that?The world is not moving with simple mechanics, and it is quite possible that you have played something without knowing it.Many people think that they are okay and they are not entangled.However, I pointed out in my book, "The Revolution of the Gaze," that was dangerous.This time, we will take up the one that is particularly related to the view of the war.From Chapter 3 "Peace" and Chapter 4 "Information", the section discussing the war was excerpted and edited.

The actual war (Warfare) is officially started by declaring war declaration (Military Conflict), such as a military conflict between combatants and incidents (Military Conflict).。However, even if you do not go through such a process, it is normal that wars are being held by non -military means.War has begun before the use of military weapons, and it can no longer distinguish between war and normal times.In addition to military actions such as gunfights and missiles, wars in the 21st century are weapons of all nations, such as politics, economy, culture, ideas, and information.

Starting with diplomatic negotiations, from direct ones such as economic sanctions, to trade duties in trade, acquiring land and real estate in the country, cultural propaganda such as music and movies, and dominance of other countries by technology such as food and electronic products. All can be a war tool. It is said that these non -military behavior accounted for 75 % in the 21st century war, and they are called the "Hybrid War." In 1999, it was already called "super -limited war" in China, but the concept of weapons of everything has existed before that. It began to attract attention in the name of the Hybrid War during the 2014 Russian intervene in the Crimean Peninsula. It is a common practice for all things to the war, but in modern times, the information technology that has been advanced is combined, and the "information warfare" is more complicated. It blends into everyday more than we think.

What is more aware of us more awarely more aware of the information system, such as hacking and rewriting on information systems, is "information manipulation" in flat time, the other information warfare. "Social engineering" that invades the system by deceiving humans, "analog hack" that attacks human recognition and awareness, and "Fake Flag Operation" that pretends to pretend to be ally and exacerbates the situation. It is also increasing, and the information warfare is becoming more sophisticated. These have been called various ways of calling, such as "false information", "guidance work", "hoax", and "propaganda". In each case, it induces images by propagating information, giving implications, fueling certain values, and confusing people, causing a division of society. In other words, in the information warfare, a war is brought to our gaze, and the head and mind are controlled from the outside.

In a world where the hybrid war is normal, it is unlikely that any social movement is completely unrelated to such information manipulation.It is new to remember that SNS communication played a major role in organizing the number of democratization movements, demonstrations, and riots that occurred in the world, including the Middle East.Even if it is a movement for peace, it cannot be denied that it is connected to the war.

In an anxious era where you don't know what's going on and you can't see the future, you'll have a strong desire to see what you want or believe.Being in that way hinders the information calmly and nurtures an attitude of simplifying the world.It looks based on justice and philosophy, a legitimacy, and being close to the weak.Only in the social change that raises such pure problem awareness is that we can easily agree and raise fists together.

However, the intention of designing the sense of justice and righteous resentment, and the intention of designing our gaze in a direction in the direction is unknown.It has been planted in our head long before the war began.War does not happen by chance.That's what someone happens.It is dangerous to be defenseless in this era.

Most people want peace and do not want to war in the first place.In our hearts, greed and anger certainly exist as a real feeling, but it rarely grows into something that wants to cause a war.Even if there is a daily desire to "want that" or "I want to live a good life", it is simply not linked to "I want to invade and exploit other countries."Also, even if you are angry that you can't forgive him or want to bother your angry opponent, it will not easily develop an anger at the level of "I want to kill the other person."To grow greed and anger, you need considerable energy.

So why do we accept the war?This is because the energy that stimulates our emotions is poured from the outside.Especially in the war, anger is raised.She is stimulated by a small anger, given a cause, and grew into a big anger energy while in sync with other people's anger.

It starts with our justification.We believe that it is difficult to avoid war because the other side wants a war for us who love peace.And the opponent is directed like a devil, and the cause and a sense of mission are given to defeat the enemy.Our attacks also hurt the opponent, but there is an excuse that there is no help for preventing it because the opponent attacks us in a more terrible cruel way.In addition, intellectuals give the legitimacy of the battle, expanding them, enhances public opinion, and the air that those who suspect it are traitor.

In this way, small processes are gradually accumulated, and our gaze is greatly guided.Just a few angry flames are growing into wars and riots that you don't want if you notice.The angry fire in the heart increases the flame as soon as oil is poured.It doesn't just create a desire to control the opponent by violence.Rather, justice, legitimacy, right reasons for helping people who are democracy, and the fact that the right reasons for helping the weak people will be more severe.Our energy will increase when you are convinced that you are doing the right thing.The way to guide our gaze to war in this way always follows the same way.

If we ask the terrorists and the people who point to the people who point to the terrorists, they will probably say, "To protect the world and important people who believe it is right." What is different from the reason we burn the anger flame? Not good and evil are divided neatly and the battle is born. The reason for fighting both is anger and sadness. In this world, there is also a malice that intentionally creates such anger and sadness and causes the cause of fighting. There are those who threaten rights, drive into situations where they can't escape, whisper the legitimacy, give energy to anger, fuel conflicts, and give funds and weapons to it. Such malice people may not be able to appear as "easy -to -understand evil" that will be accused, but rather behave dignifiedly with gratitude and respect from many people. We must be aware that those who are good at hiding in the shadows of history may be able to design our gaze skillfully and make them believe that something is right. 。

Not only in the country and the country, but also at any level, all peace starts to break from the place that is divided into "enemies and ally".So we must be careful when the opposing structure of enemies and allies is fueled.In response to the two different positions, it is necessary to be particularly remarkable if the value judgment of the "enemy" and this side is "ally".

If you look at the opponent without noticing that the confrontational scheme is skillfully set, we will not be able to judge things correctly.Once we divide enemies and allies, we tend to think that the enemy's way of thinking is 100 % wrong and that allies are 100 % correct.But, perhaps, the real enemy is not the opponent he is looking at, and does not exist in the formula of enemies and allies there.

Is the enemy really monolithic, or is there a person who tries to guide our gaze on your ally?If you think the enemy is on, you should also consider the possibility that your ally is also attached.If there are two different claims, it is often not a simple scheme that only one is 噓 and the other is true."Both have 噓" or "I think both are true."And if partial truth, partial 噓, etc. enter, it will be much more difficult to identify how true it is.

Is there a possibility that someone who looks like evil is directing so that it looks like that?Is it possible that someone who looks like justice messenger is actually the most malicious intent?Such a surprise is not just a movie or a novel.Those who really do something wrong do not appear on the table, and do not behave as if they are enemies in the conflict composition.Rather, it will play a role that will be respected by everyone or reach out in trouble.If you don't understand the various pitfalls lurking there, you will misunderstand the supporting partner.The simple view of goodwill is easy to understand and exhilarating, but it can be said that it is very childish.

Or, like professional wrestling, even if you pretend to be an enemy and allies, it is common for both sides to collaborate and enliven the atmosphere of the conflict.A diagram that has a bad enemy and a hero who saves us from that enemy.Is this a clever directing?It is a classic way to interweave a conflicting approach, which is anxiety and fear from police interrogation to fraudulent tricks.

Furthermore, it is now doubtful whether the state of colliding is a unit in the nation.Is a war really a "struggle between a nation and a state"?We simply point out the nation, such as "America", "China", "Russia," and think of it as a unity.However, each country has a variety of interests in the same government, not a simple structure like monolithic rocks.

In this world, where globalization has spread, various things are moving in different dynamics than the framework of the national nation.The current situation in the world is that there are multiple super -national organizations that can put pressure from a stronger position than sovereign state.The line of safety there is a very complicated appearance, and if you look at the war alone in the nation, you can think of the essence.

Unless we experience it directly, we have no choice but to know what is happening in the world through some information media.So far, the information flowing from television and newspapers has decided how we know the world.But now, the reliability of such mass media information is fluctuating greatly.

A news organization that should be responsible for what we need to know.If they create a specific public opinion and provide information that guides the interests of a specific person, it is inevitable to lose trust.The number of incidents that makes you feel such a thing is increasing year by year.Already, many people may have lowered their hands in the mass media's news process and agree with them.

But on the other hand, the Internet has a large pitfall.Many of the information sent there is a variety of levels in the power of coverage, the accuracy of information, and reliability.Some are unknown who gathers information and what intentions are transmitted.Whether or not to trust the information is left to the reader, and even if it is false information, the caller will not be asked by a large social responsibility like a mass media.The Internet has a problem that the structure on the back side is harder to see than television and newspapers, and it is not easy to know what kind of filter is applied to the information.

In the first place, "facts" and "claims" are blended together in the information that flows.Whether it's a mass media or a web media, the media sends information from some point of view, because of its nature.So without fear of misunderstanding, all information is fake news.The information is already intended when it is conveyed.And any production is possible depending on how you convey.Therefore, in this era, when the trust of the person who is communicated is suspicious, accepting the provided information as a fact is risky.

Where to cut out a series of events?The production has already begun at that stage.It goes without saying that cutting out shocking is easier to become news.But the meaning of the scene changes depending on what happened at other times.Is the cut scene a positive impression or a negative impression?Who will take it from the perspective?

It is possible to lead or mislead the gaze of those who receive the information in how to take up the impression and weakness.And most of all, there was no event that was not taken up.Such various assertions have already been sandwiched at the time of being transmitted.The opposite of the actual events, like the satire painting often seen on the Internet, may be cut out as "facts".

Further, how do you prove whether the events mentioned as "facts" really happened?Unless the event is confirmed, it is just information.How do you get the guarantee that the source is really trusted?Who confirmed the event?How was it confirmed?What kind of method was shared?If it was discovered later that there was no such event, what was said to be the fact will be fake news.Now, instead of "the facts are cut out as information," it is the opposite society, such as "what has been cut out as information is true."There, the objectivity and ethical of the person who convey the information, and our intelligence that receives information is important.

On the other hand, once doubted, everything looks like fake news. Not only mass media or Internet information. From the official views announced by the government to the researcher's data, you will be wondering if the intention is lurking behind it. What do you believe in when the reliability of information is fluctuating in all of them? Can a fact -checking organization believe? Can you believe the cross -checked information? There is nothing right in this society, and only information that succeeded in "making it look right" is accepted. The sender of the information tries to manipulate ourselves by pretending to be objective to believe in their claims. That's why we have to look closely at what happened in the "facts" that actually happened and where they were told.

Before that, you should imagine why the information flows "why" and how people respond if it flows.The war is not on the front, but is already set up in our gaze.It always changes its shape.At one point, it was a military invasion, sometimes a virus, sometimes climate change, and sometimes it was a food crisis.If the object that changes is fascinated, you may not notice even if something new comes.

That's why we don't become indifferent, and don't talk as if we understand what we don't understand, and we need a cool attitude that doesn't understand what we don't understand.。

Recommended sentence of Mr. Juichi Yamagoku (anthropologist)!"Excessive information flies, and we, facing the emergency situation of democracy, seeing the truth of the times and giving a gaze that is released from this obstruction."

table of contents

Chapter 1 "Common sense" Chapter 2 "Infection" Chapter 3 "Peace" Chapter 4 "Information" Chapter 5 "Advertising" Chapter 6 "Kotsu" Chapter 7 "Management" Chapter 8 "Exchange"Chapter "Liberation"